”
TITLE
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Hemispatial Neglect After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AUTHORS
Salazar APS; Vaz PG; Marchese RR; Stein C; Pinto C; Pagnussat AS. Rehabilitation Laboratory,
SOURCE
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 99(2):355-366.e1, 2018 02.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS)-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-on hemispatial neglect and performance in activities of daily living (ADL) after stroke. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, SciELO, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were searched from database inception to December 2016.
DATA SELECTION
Randomized controlled trials or crossover trials focused on determining the effects of tDCS or rTMS combined or not combined with other therapies for hemispatial neglect after stroke.
DATA EXTRACTION
Methodological characteristics of the studies, number of participants, comparison groups, interventions, and outcomes were extracted.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Ten trials comprising 226 participants had data that were suitable for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that NIBS combined with other therapies significantly improves hemispatial neglect (standardized mean difference [SMD]=-1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.57 to -1.25; I2=71%). A sensitivity analysis showed that rTMS (SMD=-2.16; 95% CI, -3.00 to -1.33; I2=76%) and tDCS (SMD=-1.07; 95% CI, -1.76 to -0.37; I2=0%) had positive effects on hemispatial neglect. Furthermore, both excitatory (SMD=-2.34; 95% CI, -3.56 to -1.12; I2=65%) and inhibitory (SMD=-1.69; 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.88; I2=75%) stimulations were effective.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis reveals moderate-quality evidence for the effectiveness of NIBS protocols combined with other therapies on hemispatial neglect and performance in ADL after stroke.
“
