Neurostimulation Methods in the Treatment of Depression: A Comparison of RTMS, TDCS, and Venlafaxine Using a Pooled Analysis of Two Studies

SOURCE
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 17 (pp 1713-1722), 2021. Date of Publication: 2021.

AUTHORS 
Hejzlar M.; Novak T.; Bares M.

ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND 
There are no head-to-head studies comparing the antidepressant effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). This pooled analysis compared indirectly the antidepressant efficacy and acceptability of rTMS, tDCS, and the antidepressant venlafaxine (VNF) extended-release.

METHOD(S) 
The analysis (n=117, both patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and non-TRD were included) examined pooled data from two 4-week, single-centered, two-armed, double-blind, randomized studies (EUDRACT n. 2005-000826-22 and EUDRACT n. 2015-001639-19). The antidepressant efficacy of right-sided low-frequency rTMS (n=29) vs VNF (n=31) and left-sided anodal tDCS (n=29) vs VNF (n=28) was evaluated. The primary outcome was a change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to the treatment endpoint at week 4. The response was defined as a >=50% reduction in the MADRS score and remission as the MADRS score <=10 points, both were calculated for the primary treatment endpoint at week 4.

RESULT(S) 
Mean change in total MADRS scores from baseline to week 4 was 7.0 (95% CI, 4.8-9.1) points in the rTMS group, 7.6 (95% CI, 5.5-9.8) in the tDCS group, and 8.9 (95% CI, 7.4-10.4) among patients in the VNF group, a non-significant difference (F(2111)=0.62, p=0.54). Similarly, neither the response rates nor remission rates for rTMS (response 31%; remission 17%), tDCS (24%, 17%), or VNF (41%; 27%) significantly differed among treatment groups (chi2=2.59, p=0.28; chi2=1.66, p=0.44). Twenty patients (17%) dropped out of the studies in a similar proportion across groups (rTMS 3/29, tDCS 6/29, VNF 11/59, chi2=1.41, p=0.52).

CONCLUSION(S) 
Our current analysis found a comparable efficacy and acceptability in all three treatment modalities (rTMS, tDCS, and VNF) and clinical relevance for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.