Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Essential Tremor: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Crossover, Add-On Clinical Trial

TITLE
Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Essential Tremor: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Crossover, Add-On Clinical Trial

SOURCE
Brain Stimulation. 13(1):190-196, 2020 Jan – Feb.

AUTHORS
Olfati N; Shoeibi A; Abdollahian E; Ahmadi H; Hoseini A; Akhlaghi S; Vakili V; Foroughipour M; Rezaeitalab F; Farzadfard MT; Layegh P; Naseri S.

BACKGROUND
There is controversial evidence about the effect of cerebellar low-frequency stimulation in patients with essential tremor (ET).

OBJECTIVES
In this study we assessed safety and effectiveness of 1Hz (low-frequency) cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on tremor severity in patients with essential tremor in a sham-controlled crossover trial.

METHODS
A total of 23 patients assigned into two groups to receive either sham (n=10) or rTMS (n=13) treatment, with crossing over after a two-month washout period. Intervention consisted of 900 pulses of 1Hz rTMS at 90% resting motor threshold or the same protocol of sham stimulation over each cerebellar hemisphere for 5 consecutive days. Tremor severity was assessed by Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) scale at baseline and at days 5, 12 and 30 after intervention. The FTM consists of 3 subscales including tremor severity rating, performance of motor tasks, and functional disability. Carry-over and treatment effects were analyzed using independent samples t-test.

RESULTS
There was no significant improvement in the total FTM scores in rTMS compared to the sham stimulation on day 5 (p=0.132), day 12 (p=0.574), or day 30 (p=0.382). Similarly, FTM subscales, including tremor severity rating, motor tasks, and functional disability did not improve significantly after rTMS treatment. Mild headache and local pain were the most frequent adverse events.

CONCLUSION
Although cerebellar rTMS seems to have acceptable safety when used in ET patients, this study could not prove any efficacy for it in reduction of tremor in these patients. Larger studies are needed to evaluate efficacy of this therapeutic intervention and to provide evidence about the optimal stimulation parameters.